Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs: Relationships Among Program Awareness, Use, and State Mandates
Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs: Relationships Among Program Awareness, Use, and State Mandates
复制标题
处方药监测计划：计划意识、使用和国家指令之间的关系
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
1.1
通讯作者：
Denis Lynch
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Williams;Selena R. Magalotti;Karyssa Schrouder;M. Knox;L. Feldman;D. Ujwal;Denis Lynch
摘要在美国，阿片类药物的不当使用显著增加，并导致了悲惨的生命损失。为了解决这个问题，处方药监测计划（PDMP）已在大多数州成立。在一些州，处方医生自愿使用这些程序，而在其他州，这是强制性的。目前的研究使用了一种自我报告的调查工具，对223名参与医生进行了管理。这项研究的目的是比较在一个州的意识和使用的PAPER的授权使用（俄亥俄州）与一个没有（北卡罗来纳州）。虽然两个州的受访者之间的意识没有显著差异，但自我报告的使用在州强制使用中显著更高（俄亥俄州强制后与俄亥俄州强制前：64%与51%; χ2 = 15.66，P < .0001;俄亥俄州强制后与北卡罗来纳州：64%与42%; χ2 = 12.76，P < .0001）。基于这些结果，强制使用可能是增加Pesticide利用率的有效方法。
Abstract The inappropriate use of opioids in the United States has increased markedly and has resulted in a tragic loss of lives. To combat this problem, prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) have been instituted in most states. Use of the programs is voluntary for prescribers in some states, whereas in other states it is mandatory. The current study used a self-report survey instrument that was administered to 223 participant physicians. The goal of the study was to compare awareness and use of the PDMP in a state that mandates use (Ohio) with one that does not (North Carolina). Although awareness was not significantly different between respondents from the two states, self-reported use was significantly higher in the state mandating use (Ohio post-mandate vs. Ohio pre-mandate: 64% vs. 51%; χ2 = 15.66, P < .0001; and Ohio post-mandate vs. North Carolina: 64% vs. 42%; χ2 = 12.76, P < .0001). Based on these results, mandating use may be an effective method to increase PDMP utilization.