What are the Consequences of Consociationalism for Sexual Minorities? An analysis of Liberal and Corporate Consociationalism and Sexual Minorities in Northern Ireland and Lebanon
What are the Consequences of Consociationalism for Sexual Minorities? An analysis of Liberal and Corporate Consociationalism and Sexual Minorities in Northern Ireland and Lebanon
复制标题
联合主义对性少数群体的后果是什么？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Nagle
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Nagle
现有的关于社会主义的研究在很大程度上争论它是否加剧了种族分裂。然而，尽管权力分享在某些情况下可以强化民族认同，但相关的后果可能是进一步边缘化官方包容范围之外的群体。虽然越来越多的文献关注女性和权力分享，但关于权力分享对性少数群体的影响的研究却很少。我在这篇文章中认为，社会主义确实以复杂的方式影响着性少数群体。为了解释社会主义类型的变化，我研究了两种不同的形式——自由主义和集体主义——它们表现出与性少数群体有关的差异。因此，我将北爱尔兰自由主义结构中的性少数群体与黎巴嫩公司形式中的性少数群体进行了比较。我发现，自由主义和企业联盟之间的差异对性少数群体产生了重要的、尽管复杂的影响。
Existing research on consociationalism largely debates whether or not it exacerbates ethnic cleavages. Yet, although power sharing in some circumstances can harden ethnonational identities, a correlative consequence may be to further marginalise groups outside the bounds of official inclusion. While an emerging corpus of literature looks at women and power sharing, little research has been done regarding the implications of power sharing for sexual minorities. I argue in this article that consociationalism does impact on sexual minorities in complex ways. To account for variations in types of consociationalism, I examine two divergent forms – liberal and corporate – that demonstrate differences in relation to sexual minorities. Thus, I compare sexual minorities within Northern Ireland’s liberal structure with those in Lebanon’s corporate form. I find that differences between liberal and corporate consociations generate important, albeit complicated, implications for sexual minorities.
北爱尔兰的性别和社团权力分享
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
Hayes B
通讯作者：
Hayes B
北爱尔兰的民族主义和对男女同性恋权利的态度
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
Hayes B
通讯作者：
Hayes B