Consistency of effects is important in replication: Rejoinder to Mathur and VanderWeele (2019).
Consistency of effects is important in replication: Rejoinder to Mathur and VanderWeele (2019).
复制标题
效果的一致性在复制中很重要：Rejoinder to Mathur and VanderWeele (2019)。
DOI：
10.1037/met0000237
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
7
通讯作者：
Schauer, Jacob M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hedges, Larry V.;Schauer, Jacob M.
在这篇反驳中，我们讨论了Mathur和VanderWeele对我们的文章“研究复制的统计分析：元分析视角”的回应，该文章出现在本期。我们试图澄清一个混淆点，包括一个原始的研究在分析的复制，和潜在的影响发表偏倚。然后，我们讨论了Mathur和VanderWeele使用的方法，对我们文章中的赌徒谬误例子进行了另一种分析。我们强调，与我们在文章中提出的方法相比，他们的方法存在一些潜在的统计和概念差异。
In this rejoinder, we discuss Mathur and VanderWeele’s response to our article,“Statistical Analyses for Studying Replication: Meta-Analytic Perspectives,” which appears in this current issue. We attempt to clarify a point of confusion regarding the inclusion of an original study in an analysis of replication, and the potential impact of publication bias. We then discuss the methods used by Mathur and VanderWeele to conduct an alternative analysis of the Gambler’s Fallacy example from our article. We highlight that there are some potential statistical and conceptual differences to their approach compared to what we propose in our article.