Ideas, implementation and indicators: epistemologies of the post-2015 urban agenda
Ideas, implementation and indicators: epistemologies of the post-2015 urban agenda
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0956247815621473
复制
发表时间：
2016-04-01
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Parnell, Susan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Barnett, Clive;Parnell, Susan
专门的城市可持续发展目标运动的成功反映了对城市在可持续发展中的重要性的共识。可持续发展目标中赋予城市的相关性是双重的，既反映在城市目标中基于地点的具体内容中，也反映在对可持续发展目标监测的多个尺度的更普遍关注将被制度化。然而，随着注意力转向执行工作，城市目标中压制的对城市和城市进程的不同看法可能会变得更加明显。承认用于使新城市议程合法化的不同理论传统是一项迟来的任务。随着2015年后这一议程的发展，这些形式的城市理论的适当性将变得更加有争议，其中包括基于地点的政策、宣传和行动主义的可能性和局限性;以及沿着沿着多个发展轴线监测和评估城市转型进程的方式。
The success of the campaign for a dedicated urban Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) reflected a consensus on the importance of cities in sustainable development. The relevance accorded to cities in the SDGs is twofold, reflected both in the specific place-based content of the Urban Goal and the more general concern with the multiple scales at which the SDGs will be monitored will be institutionalized. Divergent views of the city and urban processes, suppressed within the Urban Goal, are, however, likely to become more explicit as attention shifts to implementation. Acknowledging the different theoretical traditions used to legitimize the new urban agenda is an overdue task. As this agenda develops post-2015, the adequacy of these forms of urban theory will become more contested around, among other concerns, the possibilities and limits of place-based policy, advocacy and activism; and ways of monitoring and evaluating processes of urban transformation along multiple axes of development.