Comparison of Dinamap 8100 with sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurement in a prepubertal diabetes cohort
Comparison of Dinamap 8100 with sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurement in a prepubertal diabetes cohort
复制标题
DOI：
10.1046/j.1440-1754.2001.00752.x
复制
发表时间：
2001-12-01
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Silink, M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jin, RZ;Donaghue, KC;Silink, M
目的：比较传统的血压计与半自动Dinamap 8100（Critikon，坦帕，佛罗里达州，美国）的测量血压在青春期前儿童胰岛素依赖型diabetesmellitus.Methodology：血压测量使用两种方法在61青春期前儿童（年龄8-13岁）在189场合超过4年。使用Bland-Altman图比较测量值。跟踪相关性的血压百分位数随时间进行了分析的一般估计equation.Results：协会的准确性标准的医疗仪器的进步和英国高血压协会的“B”分级达到。两种方法测得的收缩压和舒张压差异有统计学意义（P < 0.01）。收缩压的相关系数分别为0.54（Dinamap）和0.51（血压计），舒张压的相关系数分别为0.33和0.42。结论：Dinamap 8100是一种可用于青春期前儿童临床和研究的血压计。
Objective: To compare the conventional sphygmomanometer with the semiautomated Dinamap 8100 (Critikon, Tampa, FL, USA) for the measurement of blood pressure in prepubertal children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.Methodology: Blood pressure was measured using both methods in 61 prepubertal children (aged 8-13 years) on 189 occasions over 4 years. The measurements were compared using the Bland-Altman plot. Tracking correlations of blood pressure centiles over time were analyzed by the general estimating equation.Results: Accuracy criteria of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation were met and a British Hypertensive Society 'B' grading was reached. Differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were found between the two methods (P < 0.01). For systolic blood pressure, common correlations were 0.54 (Dinamap) and 0.51 (sphygmomanometer) and for diastolic blood pressure were 0.33 and 0.42, respectively.Conclusion: The Dinamap 8100 is an acceptable alternative in clinic practice and research for prepubertal children.