Sen's Economics in The Idea of Justice: Induction vs deduction
Sen's Economics in The Idea of Justice: Induction vs deduction
复制标题
森的《正义理念》中的经济学：归纳与演绎
DOI：
10.1080/09538259.2016.1259873
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
Y.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hirai;T. and Ikemoto;Y.
在《正义的理念》一书中，阿马蒂亚·森揭示了他的能力方法在结构上与主流方法的区别：相对的维斯先验的。Sen不是根据基本原则构建模型并追求完美，而是试图比较可行的选项并从中选择一个。这一战略的背后是尊重社会中的多元价值观和理性。在这种情况下，描述在这一方法中起着关键作用，因为多元价值和推理只能以归纳的方式反映，而归纳需要丰富的描述。本文的目的是研究森的方法是如何与剑桥的传统，通常包括归纳推理方法，特别是对莫里斯多布的影响。关于这一点，他的方法的一些可能的扩展将被讨论。
InThe Idea of Justice, Amartya Sen revealingly differentiates his capability approach from the mainstream in terms of structure: comparative vis-à-vis transcendental. Instead of constructing models based on fundamental principles and questing for perfection, Sen seeks to compare feasible options and to choose one from among them. What lies behind this strategy is respect for a plurality of values and reasoning in society. In this context, description plays a key role in this approach, given that plural values and reasoning can be reflected only in an inductive manner which requires rich description. The purpose of this article is to examine how Sen’s approach is related to the Cambridge tradition, which typically embraces inductive methods of reasoning, with a particular focus on the influence of Maurice Dobb. In relation to this, some possible extensions of his approach will be discussed.