Developing a methodological framework for organisational case studies: a rapid review and consensus development process
Developing a methodological framework for organisational case studies: a rapid review and consensus development process
复制标题
制定组织案例研究的方法框架：快速审查和共识制定过程
DOI：
10.3310/hsdr04010
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Eastwood
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Rodgers;Siân Thomas;M. Harden;G. Parker;A. Street;A. Eastwood
背景 组织案例研究提案可能表述不清且方法薄弱，因此可能需要该领域的出版标准。目标 制定组织案例研究的报告标准，特别适用于英国国家卫生服务体系。设计快速证据合成和德尔菲共识流程。数据来源 通过图书馆目录检索、关键文本和作者检索、健康和社会科学数据库集中检索以及一些有针对性的网站检索来确定相关案例研究和方法文本。审查方法 报告标准分三个阶段制定：（1）快速审查现有文献以确定项目； (2) 修改德尔菲共识流程，以开发和细化内容和结构； (3) 将高度共识的德尔菲项目应用于两个组织案例研究样本，以评估其作为报告标准的可行性。德尔菲咨询的项目是从已发表的组织案例研究和相关方法文本中确定的。确定的项目被发送给德尔福专家小组进行两轮评级。参与者还被问及提出项目的临时框架是否合适，并有机会根据内容进行调整。在两轮中，高共识阈值均设定为受访者对每个项目的同意率达到 70%。然后，将德尔菲咨询中高度一致的项目应用于先前确定的案例研究出版物，以确定它们与现实世界组织案例研究报告的相关性，并更好地了解如何最好地将德尔菲咨询的结果作为报告标准实施。
Background Organisational case study proposals can be poorly articulated and methodologically weak, raising the possible need for publication standards in this area. Objectives To develop reporting standards for organisational case study research, with particular application to the UK National Health Service. Design Rapid evidence synthesis and Delphi consensus process. Data sources Relevant case studies and methods texts were identified through searches of library catalogues, key text and author searches, focused searching of health and social science databases and some targeted website searching. Review methods The reporting standards were developed in three stages: (1) a rapid review of the existing literature to identify items; (2) a modified Delphi consensus process to develop and refine content and structure; and (3) application of the high-consensus Delphi items to two samples of organisational case studies to assess their feasibility as reporting standards. Items for the Delphi consultation were identified from published organisational case studies and related methodological texts. Identified items were sent to a Delphi expert panel for rating over two rounds. Participants were also asked whether or not the provisional framework in which items were presented was appropriate, and were given the opportunity to adapt this alongside the content. In both rounds, the high-consensus threshold was set at 70% agreement among respondents for each item. High-consensus items from the Delphi consultation were then applied to previously identified case study publications to determine their relevance to the reporting of real-world organisational case studies and to better understand how the results of the Delphi consultation might best be implemented as a reporting standard.