Conflict, Power and Relative Deprivation
Conflict, Power and Relative Deprivation
复制标题
冲突、权力和相对剥夺
DOI：
10.2307/1959942
复制
发表时间：
1974
影响因子：
6.8
通讯作者：
W. Korpi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. Korpi
广泛接受的冲突预期实现办法将冲突主要视为对相对匮乏的反应，但最近，政治进程办法的支持者对这种办法提出了挑战，其核心特征是调动权力资源和争夺权力。在这里，建立了冲突的权力平衡模型，其中包含了这两种方法的核心概念。在该模型中，竞争各方之间的权力资源差异被用作中心自变量。相对剥夺、达到目标的效用和成功的期望被引入作为中介变量，以将各方之间力量平衡变化的影响与它们之间发生明显冲突的可能性联系起来。根据冲突的权力平衡模型，不同类型的相对剥夺(志愿性、递减性和渐进性)与冲突的概率会有不同的关联。相对剥夺与冲突之间的总体相关性预计微不足道。双方权力资源差距缩小的情况被视为最有利于冲突的情况。当已经较弱的一方的权力资源减少时，冲突的概率被假设为低于较弱的一方获得权力资源时的概率。
The widely accepted expectation achievement approach to conflict, which views conflict primarily as a response to relative deprivation, has recently been challenged by proponents of a political process approach, the central features of which are mobilization of power resources and the struggle for power. Here a power balance model of conflict is developed which incorporates the core concepts from both approaches. In this model the difference in power resources between the contending parties is used as the central independent variable. Relative deprivation, utility of reaching the goal and expectancy of success are introduced as intervening variables to relate the effects from changes in the balance of power between the parties to the probability of manifest conflict between them. According to the power balance model of conflict different types of relative deprivation (aspirational, decremental and progressive) will be differently correlated with the probability of conflict. The overall correlation between relative deprivation and conflict is expected to be insignificant. Situations where the difference in power resources between two parties is decreasing are seen as most conducive to conflict. When the power resources of an already weaker party are decreasing, the probability of conflict is assumed to be lower than when the weaker party is gaining power resources.