Adult and child understanding of simple reciprocal sentences
Adult and child understanding of simple reciprocal sentences
复制标题
成人和儿童对简单互惠句的理解
DOI：
10.1353/lan.2000.0091
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
W. Philip
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. Philip
根据标准的观点，互反代词有一个固定的语义值，定义了弱互反关系，任何更强的解读都可能是语用或词汇互动效应（Fiengo & Lasnik 1973，Langendoen 1978）。达林普尔等人（1995）提出相反的观点，互反代词具有灵活的语义值，定义了不同逻辑强度的阅读范围，语义原则根据其谓语的意义确定了给定互反句所需的阅读。本文介绍了心理语言学的证据，从成年人的英语，挪威语和荷兰语，并从荷兰语和挪威语，支持达林普尔等人的儿童扬声器。的分析的词汇内容的相互代词，但这也有力地表明，解释原则，他们所主张的是语用，而不是语义的性质。
According to a standard view, the reciprocal pronoun has a fixed semantic value that defines a relation of weak reciprocity, and any stronger readings it may appear to have are pragmatic or lexical interactive effects (Fiengo & Lasnik 1973, Langendoen 1978). Dalrymple et al. 1995 counterproposes that the reciprocal pronoun has a flexible semantic value defining a range of readings of varying logical strength and that a semantic principle determines the reading required for a given reciprocal sentence on the basis of the meaning of its predicate. This article presents psycholinguistic evidence from adult speakers of English, Norwegian, and Dutch, and from child speakers of Dutch and Norwegian, which supports Dalrymple et al.'s analysis of the lexical content of the reciprocal pronoun but which also strongly suggests that the interpretive principle they posit is pragmatic rather than semantic in nature.