Methods to validate nursing diagnoses.
Methods to validate nursing diagnoses.
复制标题
验证护理诊断的方法。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1987
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Fehring
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Fehring
自从护士开始正式给他们诊断和治疗的现象贴上标签以来，就有必要验证这些现象的存在。使用北美护理诊断协会（NANDA）官方护理诊断列表的护士经常发现诊断标签及其定义特征不相关，并且不是他们在临床实践中所识别的。如果这个问题继续下去，护士们将对官方诊断没有信心，充其量只会把它们看作是脱离真实的护理世界的护理领导者强加的学术练习。问题的一个根源是，目前NANDA批准的清单上的许多护理诊断都没有什么经验证据。在改进的列表上意味着诊断已经被接受，可以进行进一步的测试，验证和改进。
Ever since nurses began officially to label the phenomena that they diagnose and treat, there has a need to validate the existence of those phenomena. Nurses who use the official North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) list of nursing diagnoses often find the diagnostic labels and their defining characteristics are not relevant and are not what they identify in clinical practice. If this problem continues, nurses will not have confidence in the official diagnoses and will view them, at best, as an academic exercise imposed by nursing leaders divorced from the real world of nursing. A source of the problem is that many of the nursing diagnoses on the current NANDA-approved list were included with little empirical evidence. To be on the improved list means that the diagnosis has been accepted for further testing, validation, and refinement.