A modified sequential organ failure assessment score for critical care triage.
A modified sequential organ failure assessment score for critical care triage.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1001/dmp.2010.40
复制
发表时间:
2010-12
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Orme, James F., Jr.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Grissom, Colin K.;Brown, Samuel M.;Kuttler, Kathryn G.;Boltax, Jonathan P.;Jones, Jason;Jephson, Al R.;Orme, James F., Jr.
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score has been recommended for triage during a mass influx of critically-ill patients, but requires laboratory measurement of four parameters which may be impractical with constrained resources. We hypothesized that a modified SOFA (MSOFA) score that requires only one laboratory measurement would predict patient outcome as well as the SOFA score. After a retrospective derivation, in a prospective observational study in a 24-bed medical, surgical, and trauma intensive care unit, we determined serial SOFA and MSOFA scores on all patients admitted during calendar year 2008 and compared ability to predict mortality and need for mechanical ventilation. 1,770 patients (56% male) with a 30-day mortality of 10.5% were included in the study. Day 1 SOFA and MSOFA scores performed equally well at predicting mortality with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81-0.85) and 0.84 (95% CI 0.82-0.85) respectively (p=0.33 for comparison). Day 3 SOFA and MSOFA predicted mortality for the 828 patients remaining in the ICU with an AUC of 0.78 and 0.79 respectively. Day 5 scores performed less well at predicting mortality. Day 1 SOFA and MSOFA predicted need for mechanical ventilation on Day 3 with an AUC of 0.83 and 0.82 respectively. Mortality for the highest category of SOFA and MSOFA score (>11 points) was 53% and 58% respectively. The MSOFA predicts mortality as well as the SOFA and is easier to implement in resource-constrained settings, but using either score as a triage tool would exclude many patients who would otherwise survive.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
14.6
作者:
Christian, Michael D.;Hawryluck, Laura;Burkle, Frederick M., Jr.
通讯作者:
Burkle, Frederick M., Jr.
影响因子:
10.7
作者:
Khan, Z.;Hulme, J.;Sherwood, N.
通讯作者:
Sherwood, N.
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Pandharipande, Pratik P.;Shintani, Ayumi K.;Ely, E. Wesley
通讯作者:
Ely, E. Wesley
影响因子:
38.9
作者:
Cabré, L;Mancebo, J;Martín, MC
通讯作者:
Martín, MC
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Abdel-Ghafar, Abdel-Nasser;Chotpitayasunondh, Tawee;Uyeki, Timothy M.
通讯作者:
Uyeki, Timothy M.