Effects of one‐hour discussion on the choice of dialysis modality at the outpatient clinic: A retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching

Effects of one‐hour discussion on the choice of dialysis modality at the outpatient clinic: A retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching
复制标题

一小时讨论对门诊透析方式选择的影响:使用倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究

DOI:
10.1111/1744-9987.13941
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
1.9
通讯作者:
Shibagaki Yugo
Shibagaki Yugo
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sakurada Tsutomu;Koitabashi Kenichiro;Murasawa Masaru;Kohatsu Kaori;Kojima Shigeki;Shibagaki Yugo

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

BackgroundThe的目的是本研究的目的是评估一个小时的讨论对透析方式的选择在门诊clinic.MethodsCharts谁已经开始维持透析从2013年5月至2021年4月连续患者的影响进行了回顾性审查。透析开始时的特点进行了比较患者参加和不参加的discussion.ResultsOf 620事件透析患者,128例患者参加了讨论。在倾向评分匹配(1:1)后,参与讨论的127例患者的紧急住院率倾向于更少(13. 4% vs. 21.3%,p = 0.068)。此外,开始腹膜透析(PD)的患者更多(30.7% vs.9.4%,p < 0.001)。多变量分析显示,参与讨论(OR 4.81,95%CI 2.807-8.24;p< 0.001)与腹膜透析的开始有关。结论1小时的透析方式选择讨论可能增加腹膜透析的开始,减少紧急住院的次数。
BackgroundThe aim of present study was to evaluate the effects of one‐hour discussion on the choice of dialysis modality at the outpatient clinic.MethodsCharts of consecutive patients who had started maintenance dialysis from May 2013 to April 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Characteristics at the start of dialysis were compared between patients participated and not participated in the discussion.ResultsOf the 620 incident dialysis patients, 128 patients had participated in the discussion. After propensity score matching (1:1), 127 patients who participated in the discussion tended to have fewer urgent hospitalizations (13.4% vs. 21.3%,p= 0.068). In addition, more patients who initiated peritoneal dialysis (PD) (30.7% vs. 9.4%,p< 0.001). On multivariate analysis, participation in the discussion (OR 4.81, 95% CI 2.807–8.24;p< 0.001) was related to PD initiation.ConclusionOne‐hour discussion on the choice of dialysis modality may increase PD initiations and decrease the number of urgent hospitalizations.
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02050-y
发表时间: 2021-02-06
期刊: BMC geriatrics
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
Pel-Littel RE;Snaterse M;Teppich NM;Buurman BM;van Etten-Jamaludin FS;van Weert JCM;Minkman MM;Scholte Op Reimer WJM
通讯作者: Scholte Op Reimer WJM
DOI: --
发表时间: 2010
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
Hsiu;Jiun;Chia;P. Chiu;Ming;Yu Yang
通讯作者: Yu Yang
患者教育以及 ESRD 患者接受中心血液透析以外的肾脏替代疗法的机会。
DOI: --
发表时间: 2005
影响因子: 19.6
作者:
R. Mehrotra;D. Marsh;E. Vonesh;V. Peters;A. Nissenson
通讯作者: A. Nissenson
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.02.025
发表时间: 2019-06-01
影响因子: 0.9
作者:
Lee, Cheng-Ting;Cheng, Ching-Yao;Wu, Ming-Ju
通讯作者: Wu, Ming-Ju
患者教育和腹膜透析的选择。
DOI: --
发表时间: 2016
影响因子: 13.2
作者:
Rachael C. Walker;K. Howard;R. Morton
通讯作者: R. Morton