Examining burglars' target selection: Interview, experiment or ethnomethodology?
Examining burglars' target selection: Interview, experiment or ethnomethodology?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/10683160008410831
复制
发表时间：
2000-01-01
影响因子：
1.4
通讯作者：
Taylor, M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nee, C;Taylor, M
最近，犯罪者研究领域的民族方法学家批评了早期在住宅盗窃研究中使用监狱样本的做法。他们声称，在自然环境中采访窃贼，得出了更有效、更可靠的结论。通过描述进一步分析的数据，从早期的实验研究在监狱中的窃贼，并借鉴其他工作的住宅盗窃的结果，本文阐述了突出的调查结果之间的惊人的相似性，从采访，实验和人种学研究在这方面。最近的人种学著作非但没有贬低早期的实验和访谈研究，反而是对早期工作的补充和发展。然后讨论了在基于罪犯的研究中使用各种方法的价值。
Ethnomethodologists in the field of offender-based research have recently criticised the earlier use of prison-based samples in research on residential burglary. They claim that interviewing burglars in their natural environment has produced findings of greater validity and reliability. By describing further analysis of data from earlier experimental research on burglars in prison, and drawing on findings from other work on residential burglary, this article Sets out to highlight the striking similarity between findings from interview, experimental and ethnographic studies in this area. Far from discounting earlier experimental and interview studies, the recent ethnographic works have served to build on and complement earlier work. The value of using a variety of methods in offender-based research is then discussed.