Law and localism: the case of multiple occupancy housing
Law and localism: the case of multiple occupancy housing
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1748-121x.2012.00229.x
复制
发表时间：
2012-01
期刊：
影响因子：
0.7
通讯作者：
A. Layard
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Layard
本文探讨了规划规制如何构建地方，封装地方，优先考虑地方决策而不是区域和国家尺度。它借鉴了多职业监管的案例研究，提出了三个相互关联的观点。首先，分析强调了“当地人”的多元性以及他们之间的相互关系。其次，本文解释了地方的合法性是如何使一个地方在法律上可见的。地方（法律上、空间上和社会上）的运作和建设必须在地方主义的政治逻辑、地方决策优先于其他规模的治理产生法律效果之前发生。第三，本文解释了一旦“地方”在法律上被构建并可以做出决定，这种明显中立的地方专业知识和知识的优先级如何以有时强大的排他性和倒退效应来封闭空间和社会。
This paper investigates how planning regulation constructs the local, encapsulating a locality and prioritising local decision making over regional and national scales. It draws on a case study of the regulation of multiple occupation to make three interrelated points. First, the analysis emphasises the plurality of ‘locals’ and the interrelationships between them. Secondly, the paper explains how the juridification of the local is required to make a locality legally visible. This operationalisation and construction of the local (legally, spatially and socially) must take place before the political logic of localism, the prioritisation of local decision making over other scales of governance, can take legal effect. Thirdly, the paper explains how, once the ‘local’ is legally constructed and can make decisions, this prioritisation of apparently neutral local expertise and knowledge can act to enclose the spatial and social with sometimes powerful exclusionary and regressive effects.