Liothyronine Use Beyond Replacement Therapy, with Caution.
Liothyronine Use Beyond Replacement Therapy, with Caution.
复制标题
碘塞罗宁在替代治疗之外的使用需谨慎。
DOI:
10.1089/thy.2022.0196
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Celi,FrancescoSaverio
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Celi,FrancescoSaverio
Thyroid hormone action has a pivotal role in myo-cardial function and differentiation. Aside the wellknown positive transcriptional regulation of myosin alpha chain (1) and cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA2a)(2), thyroid hormone is a potent signal for differentiation. Conversely its action inhibits the embryonic transcriptional signature, which also occurs in postischemic remodeling (3), a maladaptive event leading to cardiac dilation, heart failure, and increased mortality. This observation represents the premise of the study of Pantos et al. published in the current issue of Thyroid (4). In this pilot double-blind placebo-controlled study, the authors treated patients affected by acute myocardial infarction with pharmacological doses of liothyronine (LT3) during the first 48 hours after primary percutaneous coronary intervention using as primary aim difference in left ventricle ejection fraction between the treatment arms six months after the ischemic event. The study did not reach statistical significance in the primary endpoint, but the results are nonetheless enticing since the data trend toward an improvement in myocardial function in the LT3-treated group. Specifically, at discharge LT3-treated patients showed smaller left ventricle size, and smaller infarct size at the six-month follow-up visit. A major strength of this study is the translational approach based on preclinical observations in animal models that guided the choices in LT3 dose and window of treatment. The authors posed extreme attention in the design by limiting the recruitment to patients with single vessel (anterior descending) disease, thus increasing the internal validity of the study. Moreover, the study was double blind placebo-controlled, myocardial function was assessed by state-of-the-art cardiac MRI, and the follow-up (six months) was adequate.Major caution though should be posed in the evaluation of the data in their entirety. One major limitation is the elimination of four patients with minimal infarction size (< 1% of left ventricle volume), which happened to occur all in the placebo group (see article, Fig. 2). When the