A Systematized Review: Gender and Race in Teamwork in Undergraduate Engineering Classrooms
A Systematized Review: Gender and Race in Teamwork in Undergraduate Engineering Classrooms
复制标题
系统回顾：本科工程课堂团队合作中的性别和种族
DOI：
10.18260/1-2--32011
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
M. Ohland
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Behzad Beigpourian;M. Ohland
团队合作是本科工程专业学生的基本技能，工程教师经常在教室里组成团队。然而，许多因素会影响团队合作的有效性。影响团队合作结果的一个因素是团队的多样性。虽然团队多样性可以提高团队的创造力和创新力，但如果管理不善，也可能对团队产生负面影响。在多样性的各种形式中，种族和性别在文献中受到了最多的关注，可能是因为它们为队友提供了视觉线索。本研究对团队合作中的种族和性别进行了系统的文献回顾。为了进行系统化的文献综述，我们遵循了Borrego、Foster和Froyd [1]建议的程序。我们检索了四个不同的数据库，包括Compendex、Scopus、ERIC和Education Source。我们发现了224篇文章，并使用了18篇文章进行系统化的文献综述。我们发现，女性和少数民族可以通过在团队中工作的教授和学生的看法，合作和沟通的模式，领导风格，团队形成策略，和同行评价的影响。我们还提出了如何在不同的团队中提高团队合作的有效性。
Teamwork is an essential skill for undergraduate engineering students, and engineering instructors often form teams in the classrooms. However, many factors can affect the effectiveness of teamwork. One factor that could affect the result of teaming is the diversity in teams. Although team diversity could increase creativity and innovation in teams, if not managed well, it could also have negative consequences for teams. Of the various forms of diversity, race and gender have received the most attention in the literature, likely because they provide visual cues to teammates. In this study, we conducted a systematized literature review related to the race and gender in teamwork. To do this systematized literature review we followed the procedure suggested by Borrego, Foster, and Froyd [1]. We searched four different databases including Compendex, Scopus, ERIC, and Education Source. We found 224 articles and used 18 articles for this systematized literature review. We found women and minorities can be affected by working in teams by the perception of professors and students, mode of collaboration and communication, leadership style, team formation strategies, and peer evaluation. We also suggested how we can increase the effectiveness of teamwork in diverse teams.