Component analysis of simple span vs. complex span adaptive working memory exercises: A randomized, controlled trial
Component analysis of simple span vs. complex span adaptive working memory exercises: A randomized, controlled trial
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.06.005
复制
发表时间:
2012-09-01
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Steeger, Christine M.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gibson, Bradley S.;Kronenberger, William G.;Steeger, Christine M.
There has been growing interest in using adaptive training interventions such as Cogmed-RM to increase the capacity of working memory (WM), but this intervention may not be optimally designed. For instance, Cogmed-RM can target the primary memory (PM) component of WM capacity, but not the secondary memory (SM) component. The present study hypothesized that Cogmed-RM does not target SM capacity because the simple span exercises it uses may not cause a sufficient amount of information to be lost from PM during training. To investigate, we randomly assigned participants to either a standard (simple span; N = 31) or a modified (complex span; N = 30) training condition. The main findings showed that SM capacity did not improve, even in the modified training condition. Hence, the potency of span-based WM interventions cannot be increased simply by converting simple span exercises into complex span exercises. (C) 2012 Society of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.