An Export Niche in the Philippines: The Commodification of a Speciality Rice in Ifugao Province
An Export Niche in the Philippines: The Commodification of a Speciality Rice in Ifugao Province
复制标题
菲律宾的出口利基：伊富高省特产大米的商品化
DOI：
10.1057/9781137031907_10
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Louis Augustin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Sekimoto;Louis Augustin
地理标志的官方承认并不总是保证市场准入的魔杖。在许多情况下，地理标志只提供当地的承认和微小的经济利益。然而，地理标志的实施帮助农民进入国内或国际市场的例子比比皆是。在某些情况下，特别是在发展中国家，地理标志的实施可能不仅意味着增加了市场准入，更重要的是，还意味着为建立市场奠定了基础（见本卷第四章）。本章介绍了来自伊富高省的特产大米Tinawon大米进入国际市场的方式，而几年前，这种大米仅为当地消费而种植。为了分析这一过程，作者仔细研究了社会变化（农民对其产品的经济、文化和社会价值的新意识），以及领土及其主要行为者与海外世界的联系。更确切地说，这种“全球本地化”使农村融入世界经济，并通过影响传统权力关系的变化对当地人口产生巨大影响（Augustin-Jean，2010; Fligstein，2001）。也就是说，虽然迪纳翁大米还不是法律的地理标志，但本章展示了它的一些特性（不仅是物质属性，还有历史和文化，沿着人民的知识--地理标志的主要组成部分）获得市场价值并成为市场创造基础的过程。因此，对Tinawon稻米的研究为分析两个相关因素提供了一个很好的机会：（1）市场实施的历史经验（Polanyi，1944年）;（2）农产品的商品化过程，这使得市场得以建立（Appadurai，1988年）。
The official recognition of a Geographical Indication (GI) is not always the magic wand that guarantees market access. In many instances, GIs only provide local recognition and minor economic benefits. Yet examples in which the implementation of a GI has helped farmers to access national or international markets proliferate. In some cases, especially in the developing world, the implementation of GIs may signify not only increased market access, but, more importantly, a base for the creation of that market (see Chapter 4 of this volume). This chapter describes the way in which Tinawon rice, a speciality rice from Ifugao province, found its way into international markets, while a few years ago it was only cultivated for local consumption. In order to analyse this process, the authors scrutinized social changes (in the form of the new consciousness of farmers in the economic, cultural, and social values of their product), as well as the links of the territory and its main actors with the overseas world. More precisely, this ‘glocalization’has integrated rural places into the world economy and has huge implications for local populations by effecting changes in traditional power relationships (Augustin-Jean, 2010; Fligstein, 2001). In other words, while Tinawon rice is still not a legal GI, the chapter shows the process by which some of its characteristics (not only its material attributes, but also its history and culture, along with the know-how of its people–the major components of a GI), acquire market values and are at the basis of the creation of the market. Consequently, the study of Tinawon rice provides a good opportunity to analyse two related factors:(1) the historical experience of the implementation of the market (Polanyi, 1944); and (2) the commodification process of an agricultural product, which permitted the creation of a market for it (Appadurai, 1988).
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Ono Shigeaki;Kikegawa Takumi;Ikuya TOKORO＆ Kaori KAWAI
通讯作者：
Ikuya TOKORO＆ Kaori KAWAI