STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8
复制
发表时间：
1986-02-08
期刊：
影响因子：
168.9
通讯作者：
ALTMAN, DG
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BLAND, JM;ALTMAN, DG
在临床测量中，经常需要将新的测量技术与已建立的测量技术进行比较，以确定它们是否足以使新的测量技术取代旧的测量技术。对这类调查的分析往往不恰当，特别是使用相关系数。相关性的使用具有误导性。另一种方法，基于图形技术和简单的计算，描述，连同这种分析和重复性评估之间的关系。
In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analysed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatablity.