Network-based Language Teaching: On-line learning in second language classrooms: An ethnographic study

Network-based Language Teaching: On-line learning in second language classrooms: An ethnographic study
复制标题

基于网络的语言教学:第二语言课堂中的在线学习:民族志研究

DOI:
10.1017/cbo9781139524735.005
复制
发表时间:
2000
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Warschauer
M. Warschauer
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Warschauer

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

埃利斯,R.(1984)。课堂第二语言发展:课堂互动和语言习得的研究。牛津:佩加蒙出版社。希金斯,J.(1988)。语言、学习者和计算机:人类智能和人工智能。伦敦:朗文。荷兰,N.(1975)。五位读者在读。纽约:牛津大学出版社。伊瑟尔,W. (1974)。隐含的读者:从班扬到贝克特的散文小说中的交流模式。巴尔的摩:约翰霍普金斯大学出版社。伊瑟尔,W. (1978)。阅读的行为。巴尔的摩:约翰霍普金斯大学出版社。兰格,J.(1991)。作为探索的讨论:文学和可能性的视野。报告系列 6.3。奥尔巴尼:纽约州立大学奥尔巴尼分校国家文学教学研究中心。 Meskill, c.、Swan, K. 和 Frazer, M. (1997)。支持基于反应的文学教学的工具:节拍一代的多媒体探索。报告 2.29。奥尔巴尼:纽约州立大学奥尔巴尼分校国家文学教学研究中心。米勒,S.(1993)。创造变革:走向对话式教学法。报告系列 2.18。奥尔巴尼:纽约州立大学奥尔巴尼分校国家文学教学研究中心。新伦敦集团(1996)。多元文学教学法:设计社会未来。哈佛教育评论,66, 60-92。帕普特,S.(1993)。儿童机器:重新思考计算机时代的学校。纽约:基础书籍。彭菲尔德,J.(1987)。媒体:交际语言学习的催化剂。马萨诸塞州雷丁:艾迪生-韦斯利。罗森布拉特,L.(1978)。读者、文本、诗歌。卡本代尔:南伊利诺斯大学出版社。萨维农,S.(1983)。交际能力:理论和课堂实践。马萨诸塞州雷丁:艾迪生-韦斯利。萨维尼翁,S.(1991)。交际语言教学:最先进的。 TESOL 季刊,25,261-277。斯奈德,T.,&帕尔蒂尔,J.(1986)。寻找最奇妙的事物:儿童、教育和计算机。马萨诸塞州雷丁:艾迪生-韦斯利。斯特维克,E.(1980)。教学语言:一种方式。马萨诸塞州罗利:纽伯里之家。瓦格纳-高夫,J. 和哈奇,E. (1975)。输入数据在第二语言研究中的重要性。语言学习,25, 997-307。维诺格拉德,T. 和弗洛雷斯,F. (1988)。理解计算机和认知:设计的新基础。马萨诸塞州雷丁:艾迪生-韦斯利。 3 第二语言课堂在线学习
Ellis, R. (1984). Classroom second language development: A study of classroom interaction and language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Higgins, J. (1988). Language, learners and computers: Human intelligence and artificial unintelligence. London: Longman. Holland, N. (1975). Five readers reading. New York: Oxford Universiry Press. Iser, W. (1974). The implied reader: Patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Langer, J. (1991). Discussion as exploration: Literature and the horizon of pos­ sibilities. Report Series 6.3. Albany: National Research Center on Literature Teaching and Learning, State University of New York at Albany. Meskill, c., Swan, K., & Frazer, M. (1997). Tools for supporting response-based literature teaching and learning: A multimedia exploration of the beat gen­ eration. Report 2.29. Albany: National Research Center on Literature Teaching and Learning, State University of New York at Albany. Miller, S. (1993). Creating change: Towards a dialogic pedagogy. Report Se­ ries 2.18. Albany: National Research Center on Literature Teaching and Learning, State University of New York at Albany. New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social fu­ tures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-92. Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books. Penfield, J. (1987). The media: Catalysts for communicative language learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem. Carbondale: Southern Illi­ nois University Press. Savignon, S. (1983). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom prac tice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Savignon, S. (1991). Communicative language teaching: The state of the art. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 261-277. Snyder, T., & PallTIer, J. (1986). In search of the most amazing thing: Children, education and computers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Stevik, E. (1980). Teaching languages: A way and ways. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Wagner-Gough, J., & Hatch, E. (1975). The importance of input data in second language studies. Language Learning, 25, 997-307. Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1988). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 3 On-line learning in second language classrooms