Sequential comparisons of relaxation training and biofeedback in the treatment of three kinds of chronic headache or, the machines may be necessary some of the time.
Sequential comparisons of relaxation training and biofeedback in the treatment of three kinds of chronic headache or, the machines may be necessary some of the time.
复制标题
放松训练和生物反馈治疗三种慢性头痛的顺序比较，或者，有时机器可能是必要的。
DOI：
10.1016/0005-7967(82)90068-7
复制
发表时间：
1982
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Rodichok,LD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Blanchard,EB;Andrasik,F;Neff,DF;Teders,SJ;Pallmeyer,TP;Arena,JG;Jurish,SE;Saunders,NL;Ahles,TA;Rodichok,LD
有两项研究报告，其中慢性头痛患者，谁没有改善显着的结果，10届，8周的放松训练计划，随后与生物反馈治疗。对于紧张性头痛患者，36%的放松无反应者在额肌电生物反馈训练后表现出显著改善。对于那些血管性头痛的患者，44%的放松无反应者在热生物反馈下表现出显着改善。合并偏头痛和紧张症状的血管性头痛患者比单纯偏头痛患者表现更好。心理测试分数显着区分成功与不成功的生物反馈反应。
Two studies are reported in which patients with chronic headache, who did not improve significantly as a result of a 10-session, 8-week relaxation training program, were subsequently treated with biofeedback. For the tension headache sufferers, 36% of the relaxation non-responders showed significant improvement with frontal EMG biofeedback training. For those with vascular headaches, 44% of the relaxation non-responders showed significant improvement with thermal biofeedback. Vascular headache patients with combined migraine and tension symptoms did better than those with only migraine. Psychological test scores significantly differentiated successful vs non-successful biofeedback responders.