Short Form 36 in the intensive care unit: Assessment of acceptability, reliability and validity of the questionnaire
Short Form 36 in the intensive care unit: Assessment of acceptability, reliability and validity of the questionnaire
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.015-az014.x
复制
发表时间：
1997-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
10.7
通讯作者：
Ridley, SA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chrispin, PS;Scotton, H;Ridley, SA
本研究的目的是评估166名普通重症监护病房出院后的成人患者的生活质量问卷简表36的可接受性、有效性和可靠性。信度通过测量项目间的相关性和Cronbach's alpha系数的内部一致性来量化。通过双向方差分析计算信度系数。结构效度是通过检查性别和年龄组之间的得分差异来测试的。内容效度通过维度得分的分布来反映。患者的可接受性似乎是合理的，尽管管理问卷需要相当长的护理时间。除了两个例子外，所有的可靠性测量都超过了公认的统计标准。建构效度是由较低的分数报告的妇女和年龄较大的群体证实。八个维度中的六个维度的分数分布在整个可能的分数范围内，表明可接受的内容效度。
The aim of this study was to assess the acceptability, validity and reliability of the Short Form 36 quality of life questionnaire in 166 adult patients following discharge from a general intensive care unit. Reliability was quantified by measuring internal consistency using correlation among items and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Reliability coefficients were calculated from two-way analysis of variance. Construct validity was tested by examining differences in scores between sex and age groups. Content validity was reflected by the spread of dimension scores. Acceptability to patients appeared reasonable, although considerable nursing time was required to administer the questionnaire. The measures of reliability exceeded recognised statistical standards in all but two instances. Construct validity was confirmed by lower scores being reported by women and older age groups. The scores of six of the eight dimensions were spread throughout the entire range of possible scores suggesting acceptable content validity.