Common Threat and Common Response? The European Union's Counter-Terrorism Strategy and its Problems

Common Threat and Common Response? The European Union's Counter-Terrorism Strategy and its Problems
复制标题

共同威胁和共同反应?

DOI:
10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00225.x
复制
发表时间:
2007
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
J. Monar
J. Monar
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Monar

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

摘要本文在分析欧盟对9/11事件后恐怖主义威胁的共同定义的基础上,对欧盟的应对措施进行了批判性的评估。欧盟对共同威胁作出了合理而具体的定义,避免了简单化的削减,是一种多层面的反应,足以处理这一威胁的不同方面-内部和外部、立法和行动、镇压和预防。然而,各国对威胁的看法不同,这一定义受到了损害。倾向于合作与协调而不是一体化的手段,以及执行不力,对共同对策的有效性产生了负面影响,其合法性也因议会和司法控制有限而受到削弱。
Abstract On the basis of an analysis of the European Union's common definition of the post-9/11 terrorist threat, this article provides a critical assessment of the EU's response. The EU has arrived at a reasonably specific definition of the common threat that avoids simplistic reductions and is a response that is sufficiently multidimensional to address the different aspects – internal and external, legislative and operational, repressive and preventive – of this threat. Yet the definition is undermined by differences between national threat perceptions. The preference for instruments of cooperation and coordination rather than integration, and poor implementation are having a negative impact on the effectiveness of the common response, the legitimacy of which is also weakened by limited parliamentary and judicial control.