DETERMINANTS OF INTERJUDGE AGREEMENT ON PERSONALITY-TRAITS - THE BIG 5 DOMAINS, OBSERVABILITY, EVALUATIVENESS, AND THE UNIQUE PERSPECTIVE OF THE SELF
DETERMINANTS OF INTERJUDGE AGREEMENT ON PERSONALITY-TRAITS - THE BIG 5 DOMAINS, OBSERVABILITY, EVALUATIVENESS, AND THE UNIQUE PERSPECTIVE OF THE SELF
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00781.x
复制
发表时间：
1993-12-01
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
ROBINS, RW
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
JOHN, OP;ROBINS, RW
我们研究了几个决定因素的法官之间的协议人格特质。在两个样本中进行交叉验证的研究结果表明，一致性是四个因素的函数：该特质代表的大五内容域，可观察的相关行为，该特质的评价性以及自我是否是法官之一。协议是最高的外向性和最低的相关性状的性格。更多的可观察性和更少的评价性特征引起了更高的判断一致性。平均而言，自我同伴协议低于同伴协议。然而，这种影响仅限于评价性特质;对于中性特质，自我同伴一致性和同伴同伴一致性一样高。这些研究结果表明，自我和同伴的知觉进行类似的过程中的中性特征，但不是高度评价的特质，提高了自我知觉的可能性，成为扭曲的特质时，情感收费。
We examined several determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits. The findings, which were cross-validated in two samples, suggest that agreement is a function of four factors: which Big Five content domain the trait represents, how observable relevant behaviors are, how evaluative the trait is, and whether the self is one of the judges. Agreement was highest for traits related to Extraversion and lowest for traits related to Agreeableness. More observable and less evaluative traits elicited higher interjudge agreement. On average, self-peer agreement was lower than,peer-peer agreement. However, this effect was limited to evaluative traits; for neutral traits, self-peer agreement was as high as peer-peer agreement. These findings suggest that self- and peer perception proceed through similar processes for neutral traits but not for highly evaluative traits, raising the possibility that self-perceptions become distorted when the trait is affectively charged.