Firefighters v. Stotts: Conflicting Models of Racial Justice
Firefighters v. Stotts: Conflicting Models of Racial Justice
复制标题
消防员诉斯托茨：种族正义的冲突模式
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1984
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Weiler
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Fallon;P. Weiler
在孟菲斯消防员诉斯托茨案中，最高法院最终解决了法官是否可以强制实行种族配额作为就业歧视补救办法的问题。这个问题是在裁员和降职的特别麻烦的情况下出现的，在这种情况下，最高法院被要求在高级白色雇员和初级黑人雇员之间“分配衰退和财政紧缩的负担“。最高法院本可以将其调查局限于这一特别棘手的问题。但大多数人选择了一个更广泛的基础-一个重新-
In Memphis Firefighters v. Stotts, the Supreme Court finally addressed the question whether a judge may impose racial quotas as a remedy for employment discrimination. The issue arose in the especially troublesome context of layoffs and demotions, in which the Court was asked to "allocate the burdens of recession and fiscal austerity"2 between senior white and junior black employees. The Court might have confined its inquiry to this particularly thorny problem. But the majority elected a broader basis-one that re-