Scientometric analysis of national university research performance in analytical chemistry on the basis of academic publications: Italy as case study
Scientometric analysis of national university research performance in analytical chemistry on the basis of academic publications: Italy as case study
复制标题
基于学术出版物对国立大学分析化学研究表现的科学计量分析:以意大利为例
DOI:
10.1007/s00216-010-3804-7
复制
发表时间:
2010
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
G. Scarponi
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Annibaldi;C. Truzzi;S. Illuminati;G. Scarponi
Citation-based scientometric indicators, for example impact factor (IF) of the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) from the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) database of Thomson Reuters [1], have become common (though not uncontroversial) tools for evaluation of the research performance of individual scientists, departments, faculties, and full universities, other research institutions, or even nations and continents [2–8]. Although their crude use as sole indicators of research performance has been questioned [9–12], particularly when original IF values across disciplines are considered without some normalization procedure [4, 13–22], it is generally acknowledged that citations and impact factors indicate (are correlated with) the scientific quality of journals [23] and that they can in fact be used, together with other indicators, for informed peer review; and the practice is indeed expanding because of the increasing frequency of requests from governments [10, 17, 22, 24]. At an international level, to quote only one example, citation and co-citation analyses were introduced long ago by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)[25, 26] and now they are always used for biannual evaluation of national performance in several fields of research [25–27].Several scientometric papers have been published concerning: national and regional research performance in analytical chemistry [28–33], analytical chemistry in the European Union (EU)[34–36], the evolution of quality in analytical chemistry journals [37], the evolution of automation in spectroscopy [38], hot topics in global analytical chemistry research (100 most cited papers)[39], and mapping the world of analytical chemistry [6, 40–42]. However, there has been no evaluation of the academic performance of a nation in analytical chemistry through scientometric analysis of the publications of university professors.