The politics of coproduction during Latin America's 'Pink Tide': Water, housing, and waste in comparative perspective

The politics of coproduction during Latin America's 'Pink Tide': Water, housing, and waste in comparative perspective
复制标题

拉丁美洲“粉红浪潮”期间的合作生产政治:比较视角下的水、住房和废物

DOI:
10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105930
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
影响因子:
6.9
通讯作者:
Goodwin G
Goodwin G
中科院分区:
经济学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Goodwin G

文献摘要

相似文献

联合生产将各种各样的国家和非国家行为者聚集在一起,创造和提供公共服务。这些发生在全球南方的过程已得到广泛研究。然而,对他们的政治没有给予足够的批判性关注。我们通过分析二十一世纪初“粉红潮”期间拉丁美洲合作生产的政治来解决文献中的这一差距。世纪初。利用原始的定性研究,本文探讨了三个不同的公共服务,水,住房和废物,在三个国家的左倾总统和政府当选为办公室厄瓜多尔,玻利维亚和乌拉圭的共同生产。我们认为,在这三种情况下,共同生产本质上是政治的,也就是说,“政治”是内部的,固有的,共同生产。我们的比较分析集中在两个政治维度--主题制作和集体忠诚--并表明,围绕这两个问题的紧张关系是厄瓜多尔、玻利维亚和乌拉圭合拍片的核心。本文论证了在合作生产分析中不把政治仅仅当作一个语境问题的重要性,并表明合作生产有能力重塑政治关系和主体性。考虑到政治因素对于理解全球南方共同生产的动态和潜力至关重要。我们的比较分析也提供了新的见解,拉丁美洲的政治,特别是关于“粉红潮”政府和公共服务的提供。
Coproduction brings together a diverse range of state and non-state actors to create and deliver public services. These processes, which occur across the Global South, have been widely studied. However, insufficient critical attention has been paid to their politics. We address this gap in the literature by analysing the politics of coproduction in Latin America during the ‘pink tide’ of the early twenty-first century. Drawing on original qualitative research, this article explores the coproduction of three distinct public services—water, housing, and waste—in three countries where left-leaning presidents and governments were elected into office—Ecuador, Bolivia, and Uruguay. We argue that coproduction is intrinsically political in these three cases; that is, the ‘political’ is internal to, and inherent in, coproduction. Our comparative analysis centres on two political dimensions—subject-making and collective autonomy—and shows that tensions around these two issues were central to coproduction in Ecuador, Bolivia, and Uruguay . The article demonstrates the importance of not treating politics as a mere contextual concern in coproduction analysis and shows that coproduction has the capacity to reshape political relationships and subjectivities. Taking politics into account is essential to understanding the dynamics and potential of coproduction in the Global South. Our comparative analysis also provides new insights into Latin American politics, especially concerning 'pink tide' governments and the provisioning of public services.