Between Communicative Interaction and Structures of Signification: Discourse Theory and Analysis in International Relations
Between Communicative Interaction and Structures of Signification: Discourse Theory and Analysis in International Relations
复制标题
交往互动与意义结构之间：国际关系中的话语理论与分析
DOI：
10.1111/insp.12005
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Anna Holzscheiter
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Anna Holzscheiter
本文讨论了当代国际关系话语理论与分析。本文认为，作为“使用中的意义”的话语已经成为建构主义学术研究的核心概念之一，具有巨大的理论和分析价值。本文确定了两种不同类型的语篇分析，这一领域的大多数贡献都集中在这两种不同类型的语篇分析上：强调语篇的交际和语用方面的微观互动方法和关注作为意义结构的语篇的宏观结构方法。将这些研究结合在一起的是他们对扩散权力关系的兴趣，这种关系是国际政治中社会互动的特征，也是“话语”一词所强调的权力的生产效应。通过结合这两种不同的话语研究流派，以及两种不同的权力概念（审议性和生产性），本文发展了一种话语方法分类，反映了话语研究的四种不同变体。通过对最近创新研究的深入讨论，说明了这些变体。最后，本文指出了目前通过话语对权力进行概念化的一些局限性，以及实证主义认识论和建构主义本体论在许多实证话语研究中令人不安的结合。本文讨论了话语与实践学术之间的重叠，并概述了该领域未来的研究方向。
This paper discusses contemporary engagement with the theory and analysis of discourse in international relations. It argues that discourse understood as “meaning in use” has emerged as one of the core concepts in constructivist scholarship, being of tremendous theoretical and analytical value. The paper identifies two distinct types of discourse analysis around which most contributions in this field converge: micro-interactional approaches that emphasize the communicative, pragmatic aspects of discourse and macro-structural approaches focusing on discourse as structures of signification. What unites these studies is their interest in the diffuse power relationships that characterize social interaction in international politics and the productive effects of power that the term “discourse” serves to underline. Through a combination of these two different strands of discourse research, with two different conceptualizations of power (deliberative and productive), the paper develops a taxonomy of discourse approaches that reflects four distinct variants of discourse research. These variants are illustrated by means of an in-depth discussion of recent innovative studies. In conclusion, the paper points to a number of limitations in the present conceptualization of power through discourse as well as in terms of the uneasy combination of positivist epistemology and constructivist ontology in much empirical discourse research. Discussing the overlap between discourse and practice scholarship, the paper sketches future directions for research in this field.
合法化的话语过程：绘制国际刑事法院案件中的说服岛
影响因子：
7.8
作者：
Deitelhoff;Nicole
通讯作者：
Nicole