Defense Transformation and Legitimacy in Scandinavia after the Cold War
Defense Transformation and Legitimacy in Scandinavia after the Cold War
复制标题
冷战后斯堪的纳维亚半岛的国防转型和合法性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Magnus Petersson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Magnus Petersson
本文分析了斯堪的纳维亚半岛的国防转型如何合法化以及享有哪些合法性。总体结果是它没有得到明确的支持。然而，北大西洋公约组织（北约）成员国丹麦和挪威与不结盟的瑞典之间以及北约成员国之间都存在相似之处和不同之处。从理论上讲，联盟成员应该更愿意转型——即使这意味着国防的“非国家化”。在丹麦，有一些保留，情况是这样，但在挪威则不然。根据同样的逻辑，不结盟的瑞典应该抵制缩减武装部队规模并将其装备用于北约远征作战行动。然而，事实并非如此。对转型持消极态度的后果是，国防军的影响力、资源、行动自由度等都会减少，尤其是对在北约背景下开展作战行动的态度更加冷淡。
This article analyzes how defense transformation in Scandinavia has been legitimized and which legitimacy it enjoys. The overall result is that it does not have unambiguous support. There are, however, similarities and differences, both between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members Denmark and Norway and nonaligned Sweden, and between the NATO members. Theoretically, the alliance members should be more willing to transform—even if it implies a “denationalization” of defense. In Denmark, that is, with some reservation, the case but not in Norway. Nonaligned Sweden should, according to the same logic, be resistant to downsizing the armed forces and gearing them for NATO expeditionary war fighting operations. However, that is not the case. A consequence of the negative attitude toward the transformation is less influence, resources, freedom of action, and so on, for the defense forces in general, and an even more lukewarm attitude toward conducting combat operations in a NATO context in particular.