An empirical evaluation of the retrospective pretest: Are there advantages to looking back?
An empirical evaluation of the retrospective pretest: Are there advantages to looking back?
复制标题
对回顾性预测试的实证评估：回顾有优势吗？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Rodgers
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Nakonezny;J. Rodgers
本文建立在有关反应转变效应和回顾性自我报告评级的研究基础上。结果表明，在治疗组的传统的前测-后测治疗设计的反应偏移偏倚的中度证据。使用明确措辞的锚的反应量表，以及测量的知识评级（认知结构）的评价方法设置，有助于减轻的反应偏移偏差的幅度。对于本研究中使用的设置和实验条件，回顾性前测-后测设计提供了一种比传统的前测-后测治疗设计更雅阁客观变化测量的变化测量。
This article builds on research regarding response shift effects and retrospective self-report ratings. Results suggest moderate evidence of a response shift bias in the conventional pretest-posttest treatment design in the treatment group. The use of explicitly worded anchors on response scales, as well as the measurement of knowledge ratings (a cognitive construct) in an evaluation methodology setting, helped to mitigate the magnitude of a response shift bias. The retrospective pretest-posttest design provides a measure of change that is more in accord with the objective measure of change than is the conventional pretest-posttest treatment design with the objective measure of change, for the setting and experimental conditions used in the present study.