Evaluating automobile fuel/propulsion system technologies

Evaluating automobile fuel/propulsion system technologies
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/s0360-1285(02)00032-1
复制
发表时间:
2003
影响因子:
29.5
通讯作者:
H. MacLean;L. Lave
H. MacLean;L. Lave
中科院分区:
工程技术1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
H. MacLean;L. Lave

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们研究了在未来20到30年内可以为美国和加拿大的汽车和轻型卡车提供动力的各种燃料和推进系统的生命周期影响((1)重新配制的汽油和柴油,(2)压缩天然气,(3)甲醇和乙醇,(4)液化石油气,(5)液化天然气,(6)天然气的费托液体,(7)氢气,和(8)电;(a)火花点火进气道喷射发动机,(B)火花点火直喷发动机,(c)压缩点火发动机,(d)具有电池动力的电动机,(e)混合电力推进选项,和(f)燃料电池)。我们回顾最近的研究,以评估环境,性能和成本特性的燃料/推进技术组合,目前可用或将在未来几十年。只有选项,可以供电的个人运输车队的显着比例进行了调查。
We examine the life cycle implications of a wide range of fuels and propulsion systems that could power cars and light trucks in the US and Canada over the next two to three decades ((1) reformulated gasoline and diesel,(2) compressed natural gas,(3) methanol and ethanol,(4) liquid petroleum gas,(5) liquefied natural gas,(6) Fischer–Tropsch liquids from natural gas,(7) hydrogen, and (8) electricity;(a) spark ignition port injection engines,(b) spark ignition direct injection engines,(c) compression ignition engines,(d) electric motors with battery power,(e) hybrid electric propulsion options, and (f) fuel cells). We review recent studies to evaluate the environmental, performance, and cost characteristics of fuel/propulsion technology combinations that are currently available or will be available in the next few decades. Only options that could power a significant proportion of the personal transportation fleet are investigated.