THE MEASUREMENT OF SELF-ESTEEM - REFINING OUR METHODS
THE MEASUREMENT OF SELF-ESTEEM - REFINING OUR METHODS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1490
复制
发表时间：
1985-01-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
DEMO, DH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DEMO, DH
通过对9年级和10年级学生实施8种自尊测量，包括自我报告、他人评分和投射工具，研究了自尊评估中的测量问题和使用多种自尊工具的情况。共55个SS，但并不是每个S都使用所有的工具。检验得分之间的相关性，提供初步的效度证据；然后，使用验证性因素分析构建测量模型，并进一步评估测量的有效性。结果表明，库珀史密斯自尊量表和罗森伯格自尊量表2种传统问卷和个人访谈对经验型自尊有较好的测量效果，3种涉及他人评价的测量方法对表现性自尊有较好的测量效果。研究结果与之前对自尊的多维概念化一致，表明需要多种方法来充分测量自我概念。(参考文献52)(心理信息数据库记录(C)2016 APA，版权所有)
Studied measurement problems in assessing self-esteem and the employment of more than 1 type of self-esteem instrument by administering 8 measures of self-esteem involving self-reports, ratings by others, and a projective instrument to 9th and 10th graders. A total of 55 Ss were involved, but each S was not administered every instrument. Intercorrelation of scores were examined to provide preliminary validational evidence; then, confirmatory factor analysis was used to construct measurement models and further assess the validity of the measures. Results suggest that 2 traditional questionnaires (the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory and Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale) and a personal interview were valid in measuring experienced self-esteem, and 3 measures involving ratings by others were valid in measuring presented self-esteem. Findings are consistent with previous multidimensional conceptualizations of self-esteem, indicating that a variety of methods is necessary to adequately measure self-concept.(52 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)