Regulating insect resistance management:: the case of non-Bt corn refuges in the US
Regulating insect resistance management:: the case of non-Bt corn refuges in the US
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.01.019
复制
发表时间：
2005-08-01
影响因子：
8.7
通讯作者：
Lemarié, S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bourguet, D;Desquilbet, M;Lemarié, S
在本文中，我们分析了美国环境保护署 (EPA) 制定的昆虫抗性管理 (IRM) 计划，该计划旨在延缓欧洲玉米螟 (Ostrinia nubilalis Hubner) 自然种群对 Bt 玉米的抗性进化。该 IRM 计划是有史以来最令人印象深刻的强制性 IRM 系统。它形成一个连贯的整体，并包括强制性避难所。提高种植者依从性的行动以及监测抗性演变的计划。然而，我们的分析表明，该 IRM 计划的两个组成部分并不完全令人满意：种植者的合规性和对抗性演变的监测。此外，注册人需要实施 IRM 的这两个组成部分，而他们对 IRM 的激励可能低于社会最优水平。我们的分析表明，当前 IRM 计划的替代方案可以改进这两个部分。 (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. 保留所有权利。
In this paper, we analyze the insect resistance management (IRM) plan put in place by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to delay the evolution of resistance to Bt corn in natural populations of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis Hubner. This IRM plan is the most impressive mandatory IRM system ever developed. It forms a coherent whole and includes mandatory refuges. actions to increase growers' compliance and a program for monitoring the evolution of resistance. However, our analysis suggests that two components of this IRM plan are not entirely satisfactory: growers' compliance and monitoring of the evolution of resistance. Moreover, the implementation of these two components of IRM has been required of the registrants, whose incentives for IRM are probably lower than the social optimum. Our analysis suggests that alternatives to the IRM plan currently in place Could improve these two components. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.