Cloninger's tridimensional personality questionnaire: Psychometric properties and construct validity in Taiwanese adults
Cloninger's tridimensional personality questionnaire: Psychometric properties and construct validity in Taiwanese adults
复制标题
DOI：
10.1053/comp.2002.30797
复制
发表时间：
2002-03-01
影响因子：
7.3
通讯作者：
Cheng, ATA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chen, WJ;Chen, HM;Cheng, ATA
尽管三维人格问卷（TPQ）在西方人群中广泛使用，作为一个有用的工具，整合了遗传和环境对人格的影响，它的一些结构仍然存在问题。本研究旨在探讨台湾成年人TPQ的心理测量特性及其与攻击性的关系。研究对象为201名台湾成年人，年龄及教育程度各不相同。采用中文版TPQ和Brown-Goodwin攻击性量表对受试者进行评定。中文版TPQ量表的内部一致性除报酬依赖（RD）量表及其分量表外，其余大部分都在可接受的范围内。对12个TPQ分量表的因子分析结果部分支持四因子模型而不是原来的三因子模型。研究结果表明，寻求新奇（NS）和避免伤害（HA）维度的结构效度与年龄呈负相关，NS 1分量表与所有HA分量表呈轻度负相关，NS与攻击性呈正相关。我们的结论是，HA和NS规模的TPQ是跨文化的鲁棒性，而RD规模需要细化。版权2002年，爱思唯尔科学（美国）。All rights reserved.
Despite the wide use of the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ) in Western populations as a useful tool integrating both genetic and environmental influences on personality, some of its constructs remain questionable. In this study, we examined the psychometric properties of the TPQ and its relationship with aggression in Taiwanese adults. The subjects were 201 Taiwanese adults of wide ranges in age and educational level. Subjects were assessed using a Chinese version of the TPQ and the Brown-Goodwin Aggression Inventory. The internal consistency of the Chinese version of the TPQ scales is found to be mostly in the acceptable range except for the reward dependence (RD) scale and its subscales. The results of factor analysis of the 12 TPQ subscales partially support the four-factor model rather than the original three-factor model. The construct validity of the novelty seeking (NS) and harm avoidance (HA) dimensions is supported by the findings that the NS is negatively correlated with age, the NS1 subscale is slightly negatively correlated with all the HA subscales, and the NS is positively correlated with aggression. We conclude that both the HA and NS scales of the TPQ are cross-culturally robust, while the RD scale needs to be refined.Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.