The Japanese socialist party and neutralism
The Japanese socialist party and neutralism
复制标题
日本社会党与中立主义
DOI：
10.2307/2942439
复制
发表时间：
1969
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Stockwin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. W. Beer;J. Stockwin
《德川日本的社会秩序》）。德川的制度并不完全反对商业化，实际上在某种程度上鼓励商业化。S. Crawcour，“德川时代日本商业的变化”）。幕府的专制对阿武伊戏剧产生了有益的美学影响，使它摆脱了女性卖淫，并迫使它在内容方面缺乏自由，转向艺术（唐纳德H。Shively，“Ba！(ufu相对于KabukjT）。封建主义的概念本身，因为它可能适用于日本，在本书的两篇开篇文章中得到了最复杂的关注。在《德川时代与日本封建主义》一书中。斯特雷耶坦率地承认，使用德川日本的“封建”一词是恰当的。然后，他评估了封建制度的长短点，因为它们有助于或阻碍了现代化，发现“它的缺陷”。. .比它作为推动变革的力量的优点更重要。约翰·霍尔的《日本的封建主义--再评价》强调的是制度从16世纪与封建模式非常接近的状态向越来越偏离封建模式的状态的演变，把18世纪70年代的制度变迁描述为“废除封建主义”是使用了比历史事实更戏剧化的语言。这本书标志着并进一步推动了第二次世界大战以来英语世界学者在明治以前的日本制度研究方面取得的巨大进展。
the Social Order in Tokugawa Japan"). The Tokugawa system was not wholly hostile to commercialization, but actually encouraged it to some degree (E. S. Crawcour, "Changes in Japanese Commerce in the Tokugawa Period"). The very authoritarianess of the shogunate had a beneficial aesthetic effect on the \abu\i theater, by freeing it from female prostitution and forcing it, for lack of freedom in matters of content, to turn to art (Donald H. Shively, "Ba!(ufu versus KabukjT). The concept of feudalism itself, as it may apply to Japan, receives the most sophisticated attention yet in the two opening articles of the book. In "The Tokugawa Period and Japanese Feudalism" Joseph R. Strayer admits forthrightly the appropriateness of using the word "feudal" of Tokugawa Japan. He then appraises the long and short points of feudal institutions, as they aided or impeded modernization, finding "its defects . . . more important than its merits as forces favoring change." "Feudalism in Japan—A Reassessment" by John Hall stresses rather the evolution of institutions out of a condition in the sixteenth century that closely approximated the feudal model to something that deviated more and more from it. To describe the institutional changes of the eighteen-seventies as "the abolition of feudalism" is to use more dramatic language than the historical facts warrant. The book signalizes and furthers, the great progress that has been made in institutional studies of pre-Meiji Japan by scholars of the English-speaking world in the period since World War II.