Commentary: The Human Circadian Response to Light-Strong and Weak Resetting
Commentary: The Human Circadian Response to Light-Strong and Weak Resetting
复制标题
评论：人类昼夜节律对光强和弱重置的反应
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1993
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
C. Czeisler
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Kronauer;M. Jewett;C. Czeisler
Beersma和Daan的论文（本期）重新解释了我们关于明亮光线对人类的昼夜节律相移效应的数据（Czeisler等人，1989年）。在我们看来，Beersma和Daan误解了0型和I型重置之间关系的数学基础，不仅不准确地代表了我们的数据，而且也不准确地代表了其他研究者的数据。我们组织了我们的答复，以便分别处理我们不同意的问题。
The paper by Beersma and Daan (this issue) offers a reinterpretation of our data on the circadian phase-shifting effect of bright light on humans (Czeisler et al., 1989). In our view, Beersma and Daan misunderstand the mathematical basis of the relationship between type 0 and type I resetting, and inaccurately represent not only our data but the data of other investigators. We have organized our response so as to deal separately with the issues on which we disagree.