Does a Brief Motivational Intervention Reduce Frequency of Pregaming in Mandated Students?
Does a Brief Motivational Intervention Reduce Frequency of Pregaming in Mandated Students?
复制标题
DOI：
10.3109/10826084.2016.1152494
复制
发表时间：
2016-01-01
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Carey, Kate B.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Borsari, Brian;Merrill, Jennifer E.;Carey, Kate B.
背景：饮酒前饮酒，也称为前饮或饮酒前，是大学生中常见但危险的饮酒行为。然而，很少有人知道的方式，其中一个简短的动机干预（BMI）解决一般酒精的使用和后果可能会影响pregaming频率。对象：是：本研究探讨了是否强制学生减少频率的pregaming后BMI时，pregaming自发讨论，以及性别是否调节这些影响，方法：参与者（n = 269，32%女性）是强制大学生谁收到了校园为基础的酒精引用，并继续表现出危险的酒精使用后，六周接受简短的建议会议。参与者被随机分配到简单的动机干预（BMI，n = 145）或仅评估（AO，n = 124），并在干预后3个月，6个月和9个月完成随访评估。分层线性模型（HLM）用于检查两个人之间（2级）的影响（即，条件）和人内（1级）效应（即，时间）上的pregaming频率。使用已转录的BMI会话的子样本（n = 121）进行分析，检查BMI内的pregaming讨论。结果：与AO组相比，BMI组的参与者没有显著降低pregaming的频率，即使在BMI期间明确讨论了hen pregaming。此外，BMI在降低男性和女性的游戏前频率方面同样无效。结论/重要性：游戏前的频率似乎对传统的干预措施有抵抗力，但最近的研究提出了几种解决大学生群体游戏前问题的创新策略。
Background: Pregaming, also known as frontloading or predrinking, is a common but risky drinking behavior among college students. However, little is known about the way in which a brief motivational intervention (BMI) addressing general alcohol use and consequences may impact pregaming frequency. Object:yes: This study examined whether mandated students reduced frequency of pregaming following a BMI when pregaming was spontaneously discussed and whether gender moderated these effects, Methods: Participants (n = 269,32% female) were mandated college students who had received a campus-based alcohol citation and continued to exhibit risky alcohol use six weeks after receiving a brief advice session. Participants were randomized to a brief motivational intervention (BMI, n = 145) or assessment only (AO, n = 124) and completed follovv-up assessments at 3, 6, and 9 months postintervention, Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) was used to examine both between person (Level 2) effects (i.e., condition) and within-person (Level 1) effects (i.e., time) on pregaming frequency.. Analyses examining discussions of pregaming within the BMI were conducted using a sub sample of the BMI sessions which had been transcribed (n = 121), Results: Participants in the BMI group did not significantly reduce the frequency of pregaming compared to those in the AO group, even hen pregaming was explicitly discussed during the BMI. Moreover, the BMI was equally ineffective at reducing pregaming frequency for both males and females. Conclusion/Importance: Pregaming frequency appears to be resistant to conventional intervention efforts, but recent research suggests several innovative strategies for addressing pregaming in the college student population.