The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
复制
发表时间：
2009-10-01
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
Moher, David
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Liberati, Alessandro;Altman, Douglas G;Moher, David
系统的综述和荟萃分析对于准确和可靠地总结与卫生保健干预的有效性和安全性有关的证据是必不可少的。然而，这些报告的清晰度和透明度并不是最佳的。系统评价的糟糕报告降低了它们对临床医生、政策制定者和其他用户的价值。自1999年公布的报告准则此外，对已发表的系统性综述的审查发现，关于这些研究的关键信息往往报道得很少。意识到这些问题，一个包括有经验的作者和方法学家的国际小组开发了PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)，作为最初的保健干预措施评价的系统审评和荟萃分析的Quorom指南的演变。PRISMA声明由27项清单和四相流程图组成。清单包括被认为对系统审查的透明报告至关重要的项目。在这份解释和详细说明文件中，我们解释了每个核对表项目的含义和基本原理。对于每个项目，我们都包括一个良好报告的例子，并在可能的情况下，参考相关的实证研究和方法文献。PRISMA声明、本文件和相关网站(http://www.prisma-statement.org/))应是改进系统审查和荟萃分析报告的有用资源。
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinicians, policy makers, and other users. Since the development of the QUOROM (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analysis) Statement--a reporting guideline published in 1999--there have been several conceptual, methodological, and practical advances regarding the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Also, reviews of published systematic reviews have found that key information about these studies is often poorly reported. Realizing these issues, an international group that included experienced authors and methodologists developed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) as an evolution of the original QUOROM guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evaluations of health care interventions. The PRISMA Statement consists of a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram. The checklist includes items deemed essential for transparent reporting of a systematic review. In this Explanation and Elaboration document, we explain the meaning and rationale for each checklist item. For each item, we include an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature. The PRISMA Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.prisma-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.