A critical analysis of Markovian monism.
A critical analysis of Markovian monism.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1007/s11229-021-03075-x
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
1.5
通讯作者:
Beni MD
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Beni MD
Free Energy Principle underlies a unifying framework that integrates theories of origins of life, cognition, and action. Recently, FEP has been developed into a Markovian monist perspective (Friston et al. in BC 102: 227–260, 2020). The paper expresses scepticism about the validity of arguments for Markovian monism. The critique is based on the assumption that Markovian models are scientific models, and while we may defend ontological theories about the nature of scientific models, we could not read off metaphysical theses about the nature of target systems (self-organising conscious systems, in the present context) from our theories of nature of scientific models (Markov blankets). The paper draws attention to different ways of understanding Markovian models, as material entities, fictional entities, and mathematical structures. I argue that none of these interpretations contributes to the defence of a metaphysical stance (either in terms of neutral monism or reductive physicalism). This is because scientific representation is a sophisticated process, and properties of Markovian models—such as the property of being neither physical nor mental—could not be projected onto their targets to determine the ontological properties of targets easily.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
1.5
作者:
Friston, Karl J.;Stephan, Klaas E.
通讯作者:
Stephan, Klaas E.
影响因子:
0.9
作者:
Frigg, Roman;Nguyen, James
通讯作者:
Nguyen, James
影响因子:
2
作者:
Friston, Karl;Rigoli, Francesco;Pezzulo, Giovanni
通讯作者:
Pezzulo, Giovanni
影响因子:
2.1
作者:
Clark, Andy
通讯作者:
Clark, Andy
影响因子:
1.5
作者:
Contessa, Gabriele
通讯作者:
Contessa, Gabriele