Questioning knowledge foundation: What is the best way to integrate knowledge to achieve substantial disaster risk reduction?
Questioning knowledge foundation: What is the best way to integrate knowledge to achieve substantial disaster risk reduction?
复制标题
质疑知识基础：整合知识以实现大幅减少灾害风险的最佳方式是什么？
DOI：
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101850
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
M. Kervyn
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Bwambale;M. Nyeko;M. Muhumuza;M. Kervyn
自然灾害造成的灾害持续产生重大影响，引发了有关为大幅减少灾害风险而建议采取的措施的认知可通约性的问题。本研究以减少洪水风险（FRR）为例，批判性地回顾了有关减少灾害风险的本土、科学和综合知识观点的认知基础的关键科学文献。结果表明，FRR 措施的采用取决于从制定措施的角度来看，风险社区在生活经历中的相关性或分离程度。然而，越来越多地推荐的综合知识视角很少掌握生活经验。因此，在与非水纯哲学理论类比的基础上，提出了综合知识视角的扩展，推导出非水纯框架。该框架阐述了如何在两个内在要素的组合上建立适当的 FRR 知识整合：特定洪水易发环境（即 thehyle）的土著生活经验和特定环境的洪水风险科学（即 themorphe）。
The continued significant impacts of disasters from natural hazards raise questions regarding the epistemic commensurability of measures recommended to achieve substantial disaster risk reduction. Using the case of Flood Risk Reduction (FRR), this study critically reviews key scientific literature on the epistemic foundations of the indigenous, scientific, and integrated knowledge perspectives to disaster risk reduction. Results suggest that the adoption of measures for FRR is determined by how related or detached, in their lived experiences, communities-at-risk are from the perspective into which measures are framed. Yet the increasingly recommended integrated knowledge perspective rarely grasps lived experience. Therefore, an extension of the integrated knowledge perspective is proposed based on an analogy with the philosophical theory ofhylomorphismto derive ahylomorphicframework. This framework elaborates how appropriate knowledge integration for FRR should be founded at a composite of two intrinsic elements: the indigenous lived experience of a specific flood prone context (i.e., thehyle) and the context-specific flood risk science (i.e., themorphe).