A dual process model of generation and evaluation: A theoretical framework to examine cross-cultural differences in the creative process
A dual process model of generation and evaluation: A theoretical framework to examine cross-cultural differences in the creative process
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.012
复制
发表时间：
2019-03-01
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Kurman, Jenny
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ivancovsky, Tal;Shamay-Tsoory, Simone;Kurman, Jenny
本研究的目的是在双重模型的基础上考察创造力的跨文化差异，根据双重模型，创造力包括想法产生和想法评估两个阶段。我们认为，在东亚文化中，评估更为严格，在那里，独特的想法比西方文化更有可能受到抑制。为了检验提出的模型，对以色列、韩国和日本的样本进行了三项研究。研究1测量了对其他人产生的想法的评价。与韩国人和日本人相比，以色列人表现出更高的发散性思维（DT），对想法的评估也不那么严格。研究2采用文化启动。在不同文化中，西方启动比东方启动对思想的评价更宽松。在研究3中，以色列人和日本人评估他们自己的想法。与日本人相比，以色列人表现出更高的DT和更宽松的评价。总的来说，创造力的跨文化差异似乎部分可以用评估严格程度的不同来解释。
The purpose of this study was to examine cross-cultural differences in creativity based on the two-fold model, according to which creativity involves idea generation and idea evaluation phases. We contend that evaluation is more stringent in East-Asian cultures, where unique ideas are more likely to be inhibited, than in Western cultures. In order to examine the proposed model, three studies were conducted with Israeli, South-Korean and Japanese samples. Study 1 measured evaluation of ideas generated by other individuals. Israelis exhibited higher divergent thinking (DT) and evaluated ideas less stringently than did Koreans and Japanese. In Study 2 cultural priming was used. Western priming led to more lenient evaluation of ideas than Eastern priming, across cultures. In Study 3, Israelis and Japanese evaluated their own ideas. Israelis exhibited higher DT and more lenient evaluation compared to Japanese. Collectively, it appears that cross-cultural differences in creativity are partly explained by variations in evaluation stringency.