Introduction: Scottish Romanticism
Introduction: Scottish Romanticism
复制标题
简介:苏格兰浪漫主义
DOI:
10.1080/10509585.2016.1190101
复制
发表时间:
2016
影响因子:
0.2
通讯作者:
Pittock M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pittock M
The idea of national Romanticisms is of course central to the idea of Romanticism itself, but while this is widely acknowledged in many contexts, in the post-1945 era the delineation of national Romanticisms within the British Isles became fuzzy and ill-defined: indeed in many cases, omitted or repressed. The reasons for this are, as I argued in Scottish and Irish Romanticism, strongly bound up with the rejection of a Herderian and social notion of Romanticism and Romantic literature in the postwar era in favor of a unified–but in fact quite narrow–aesthetic definition. The growth of historicist and thematic studies of the Romantic era in the post-1980 period was an important corrective to this trend, but in many respects did little to change the denationalized nature of Romantic criticism linked to the British Isles, nor indeed did it alter the undergraduate curriculum, as Sharon Ruston’s groundbreaking 2006–2007 survey showed (Higgins and Ruston). The denationalizing of Scotland in particular was not merely a matter of focusing on a core canon of “British” writers and pushing less well-known figures or women such as Charles Maturin, Maria Edgeworth, Susan Ferrier, or Sydney Owenson to the margins. It was so extreme that writers of unquestionable global significance were simply excluded from the core areas of Romantic curriculum and study. The influence of Sir Walter Scott and Robert Burns are felt in every part of the globe: yet while in the 1930s, Burns normally ranked in the middle of the pack of “Big Seven” poets by the number of articles published, by the 1950s he was in a catastrophic decline. At the time of Ruston’s study, he did not form a core part of the English literature curriculum anywhere in the UK, though he had some presence in Scotland: yet there were 23 editions of Burns in print. The poet was being sold on London railway bookstalls while being regarded as too outré to teach to London undergraduates, almost the reverse of the situation with respect to some of the great figures of Modernism. Scott, for whom the tired quip of the “Great Unread” is still utilized as a label to cut off further thought or the presentation of any evidence, was the first of the Scottish Romantics to be comprehensively re-edited from 1985: the resulting uncompromisingly scholarly and largely hardback edition of the Edinburgh Edition of the Waverley Novels has sold well in excess of 100,000 copies. The market for Scott today clearly and demonstrably dwarfs that for some other Romantic writers regarded as more “mainstream” as surely now as it did in the period which William St Clair has so ably examined in The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period. In the 1930s, Scott was set for School Certificate in England; in 1989, the present author was asked at a major UK university how Scott could be taught to English undergraduates at all. The shift was nigh on complete.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1997
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
K. Trumpener
通讯作者:
K. Trumpener
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Mary
通讯作者:
Mary
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
H. Trevor
通讯作者:
H. Trevor
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
Pittock, Murray
通讯作者:
Pittock, Murray
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
Pittock, Murray
通讯作者:
Pittock, Murray