Ethical Issues in Archaeology
Ethical Issues in Archaeology
复制标题
考古学的伦理问题
DOI：
10.5860/choice.41-2256
复制
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Hollowell
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Zimmerman;K. Vitelli;J. Hollowell
致敬论文，分为四个部分。第一部分探讨了考古学伦理学的起源和发展。艾莉森·怀利（Alison Wylie）（第1章）提供了一个有趣的，虽然简短的，看看考古伦理学如何融入更大的哲学领域。她将道德定义为指导我们行动并规定和禁止某些行为的标准。她还指出了基于后果的道德理由之间的区别（即，行为的效果）和基于义务论方法的那些（即，行为的内在品质）。这两种方法构成了哲学竞技场的框架，在这个竞技场上，其他贡献者展开了角逐。在第二章中，马克·莱诺特介绍了北美考古学的伦理学史，主要集中在职业守则的发展上。第二部分涉及对考古记录的责任。第三章（尼尔·布罗迪和大卫·吉尔）和第四章（朱莉·霍洛厄尔-齐默）讲述了高端和低端的抢劫。前者服务于国际古董市场，后者服务于小型本地市场。
tributed papers, divided into four sections. Part I looks at the origins and development of archaeological ethics. Alison Wylie (Chapter 1) provides an interesting, although brief, look at how archaeological ethics fit into the larger philosophical field. She defines ethics as standards that guide our actions and prescribe and prohibit certain kinds of behaviour. She also points out the difference between ethical justifications based on consequence (i.e., the action's effect) and those based on a deontological approach (i.e., the action's intrinsic qualities) . These two approaches frame the philosophical arena in which the other contributors joust. In Chapter 2, Mark Lynott provides a history of ethics in North American archaeology, principally focused on the development of professional codes. Part II deals with responsibilities to the archaeological record. Chapters 3 (Neil Brodie and David Gill) and 4 (Julie Hollowell-Zimmer) address high and low-end looting. The former serves the international antiquities market while the latter serves small local mar-