ASSESSMENT OF SOCIAL-COMMUNICATIVE ANXIETY VIA SELF-REPORTS - COMPARISON OF MEASURES
ASSESSMENT OF SOCIAL-COMMUNICATIVE ANXIETY VIA SELF-REPORTS - COMPARISON OF MEASURES
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/03637757809375966
复制
发表时间：
1978-01-01
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
DALY, JA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DALY, JA
推导任何人格维度的一般总结性命题的一个必要假设是，评估该特征的措施是等效的。在沟通中，对社交焦虑的研究反映了这一假设。本研究评估了社会交往焦虑自我报告措施的假设的准确性。十四仪器，代表三个概念组（性能，沟通和社交焦虑）完成了一组本科生。完成了三个主要的经验等效性测试（相关性，因子分析，分类分析）。结果表明，几乎每一个措施是显着的，强烈相关的大多数其他措施，大多数反映了相同的一般结构。分类分析显示，只有中等协议的措施。完成了重复研究，支持了主要研究的结论。此外，不同的措施进行了比较的内部一致性和社会可取性。
A necessary assumption for the derivation of general summative propositions about any personality dimension is that measures assessing the characteristic are equivalent. In communication, research on social‐communicative anxiety has reflected this assumption. The present research assessed the accuracy of the assumption in terms of self‐report measures of social‐communicative anxiety. Fourteen instruments, representative of three conceptual groups (performance, communicative and social anxiety) were completed by a group of undergraduates. Three major tests of empirical equivalence were completed (correlations, factor analysis, classification analysis). Results indicated that virtually every measure was significantly and strongly associated with most other measures and most reflected the same general construct. The classification analysis revealed only moderate agreement among measures. A replication was completed which supported the conclusion of the primary study. In addition, the different measures were compared in terms of internal consistency and social desirability.