Differential sensitivity of p53(-) and p53(+) cells to caffeine-induced radiosensitization and override of G2 delay.
Differential sensitivity of p53(-) and p53(+) cells to caffeine-induced radiosensitization and override of G2 delay.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/0360-3016(95)97825-l
复制
发表时间:
1995-04
期刊:
影响因子:
11.2
通讯作者:
S. Powell;J. DeFrank;Paul Connell;M. Eogan;FredericI. Preffer;D. Dombkowski;Wei Tang;S. Friend
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Powell;J. DeFrank;Paul Connell;M. Eogan;FredericI. Preffer;D. Dombkowski;Wei Tang;S. Friend
PurposeMost drug discovery efforts have focused on finding new DNA damaging agents to kill tumor cells preferentially. An alternative approach is to find ways to increase tumor specific killing by modifying tumor specific responses to that damage. We asked whether cells lacking the G1/S arrest in response to X-rays are more sensitive to X-ray damage when treated with agents that override G2/M arrest.Materials and MethodsMouse embryonic fibroblasts genetically matched to be (+/+) or (-/-) p53 and rat embryonic fibroblasts (REF) made (+) or (-) for wild-type p53 function by transfection were irradiated with and without caffeine, a known checkpoint inhibitor. Caffeine treatment was maintained for 24 hours from 1 hour prior to irradiation. Cell survival following ionizing radiation was measured by clonogenic assay. For cell-cycle analysis, cells were in exponential asynchronous growth at the time of irradiation. The proportion of cells in G1, S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle were recorded immediately before and following irradiation and subsequently at 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 and 48 hours following irradiation.ResultsCaffeine was found to cause radiosensitzation at low dose (0.5 mM) in (-/-) cells but not in (+/+) cells. The sensitization enhancement ratio (SER) was 1.45 at 0.1 survival and 1.56 at 0.01 survival. At this dose of caffeine, this SER reflected therapeutic gain as there was no detectable effect on (+/+) cells. At 1mM caffeine, sensitization of (-/-) cells was 1.77, but (+/+) cells now also showed sensitization (SER= 1.25). In (-/-) cells at 0.1 mM caffeine the SER was 1.5 at 0.01 survival. The transfected REF cells (functionally for p53) also exhibited caffeine-induced radiosensitization at both 0.5 and 2mM caffeine with a SER= 1.45 for 2mM at 0.1 survival. No significant sensitization could be demonstrated for REF cells at the same doses of caffeine. The REF cells, with wild-type p53, transfected with pCMVneo alone showed no change in radiosensitivity or G1/S arrest. Cell cycle checkpoint arrest in response to 4 or 8 Gy X-rays was measured without caffeine and with 0.5 and 2mM caffeine. In (+/+) cells, G1/S and G2/M arrest was seen and there was no demonstrable impact of caffeine at either dose on either checkpoint. By contrast (-/-) cells showed a clear reduction (50%) of the size of G2/M arrest at 0.5 mM caffeine and complete override at 2mM caffeine. These data imply that cells which lack p53, are sensitized by low-dose caffeine and their G2/M checkpoint is altered, seen by the different effects of caffeine upon G2/M override. Tumor cells which do and do not have functional p53 have also been evaluated. Preliminary data suggest a similar conclusion can be drawn. MCF-7 cells transfected with control plasmid or plasmids containing the gene for HPV-E6 protein also show sensitization with low dose caffeine only in cells which have E6.ConclusionsThe greater caffeine-induced radiosensitization in p53 (-) cells suggests that p53, already shown to control the G1/S checkpoint, may also influence aspects of G2/M arrest. These data indicate an opportunity for therapeutic gain by combining DNA damaging agents with compounds that disrupt G2/M arrest in tumors lacking functional p53. The role of p53 in G2/M transition remains to be defined.