WATER AND ARSENIC IN BANGLADESH
WATER AND ARSENIC IN BANGLADESH
复制标题
孟加拉国的水和砷
DOI：
10.1212/wnl.58.6.987-a
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
9.9
通讯作者：
F. Sultana
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
F. Sultana
女权主义学者通过证明性别关系在各地各种资源斗争中的核心重要性，丰富了政治生态学和资源管理文献（Agarwal，1992年; Rocheleau等人，1996年）。最近的工作以这一贡献为基础，表明性别问题是通过这种斗争来实现和谈判的，同时涉及制约身体、空间和环境的权力关系（Gururani，2002年; Harris，2006年; Resurreccion和Elmhirst，2008年; Sultana，2009年a）。这一研究呈现了一幅复杂的图景-特别是显示了与性别有关的主体性是如何通过社会进程和生态实践进行谈判和体现的，同时又与其他主体地位，如阶级、种族、年龄或种姓交叉。性别如何影响不同主体和地理位置对资源的获取、控制和所有权，一直是女性主义政治生态学的一个关键主题。本章认为，这一研究子领域可以进一步加强通过评估复杂的情感地理信息资源管理。这种关注有助于阐明这种管理可以被视为定义日常生活的情感过程的明显但隐藏的方式。这种联系在女权主义政治生态学中几乎没有，更不用说在它所属的更广泛的研究领域了。然而，情感地理学文献充满了见解，这些见解只是等待适应政治生态学中所讨论的主题（例如，Bondi，2005; Davidson等人，2005; Pile，2010; Sharp，2009; Smith等人，2009年）。在本章中，我将通过概述情感政治生态学方法的一些要素来推动这一进程。通过这样做，我证明了注意资源获取、使用和冲突所附带的复杂情感和意义的重要性，以便更好地理解日常斗争中的情感性。这不仅导致在理解资源斗争和政治方面存在更大的细微差别;它还拒绝了这样一种观点，即“真实的”学术是关于资源的“理性”社会互动，而这种互动将关于资源如何获得、使用和争夺的情感现实牢牢地留在一边。事实上，（女权主义）政治生态将大大加强时，往往抽象的“资源斗争”和“资源冲突”的表达是植根于具体的情感地理的地方，人民和资源，使资源和情感如何在日常资源管理实践中相互交织的理解增强。因此，一个情绪的政治生态学方法阐明了情绪如何在自然-社会关系中发挥作用。在这样的奋进中，如何理解情感？情感地理学的研究在这里提供了一个有用的起点。Davidson等人（2005：3）将情感地理学定义为“试图从经验和概念上理解情感的社会空间中介和表达方式，而不是将其定义为
Feminist scholarship has enriched political ecology and resources management literatures by attesting to the central importance of gender relations in resource struggles of various kinds across places (Agarwal, 1992; Rocheleau et al., 1996). Recent work builds on this contribution by demonstrating that gender is performed and negotiated through such struggles while involving power relations that condition bodies, spaces and environments (Gururani, 2002; Harris, 2006; Resurreccion and Elmhirst, 2008; Sultana, 2009a). This scholarship renders a complex picture – notably showing how gender-related subjectivities are negotiated and embodied through social processes and ecological practices while intersecting with other subject positions, such as class, race, age or caste. How gender shapes access to, control over and ownership of resources across different subjectivities and geographical locations has been a key theme in feminist political ecology. The present chapter argues that this research sub-field can be further strengthened by assessing the complex emotional geographies that inform resource management. Such a focus helps to elucidate the conspicuous but also hidden ways that this management can be conceived of as an emotional process defining everyday life. This connection has been scarcely made in feminist political ecology, let alone in the wider research field of which it is part. Yet the emotional geographies literature abounds with insights that are just waiting to be adapted to the topics addressed in political ecology (e.g. Bondi, 2005; Davidson et al., 2005; Pile, 2010; Sharp, 2009; Smith et al., 2009). In this chapter, I promote such a process by outlining some of the elements of an emotional political ecology approach. In so doing, I demonstrate the importance of heeding the complex emotions and meanings attached to resource access, use and conflict in order to better understand the emotionality thereby engaged in everyday struggles. Not only does this lead to greater nuance in understanding resources struggles and politics; it also rejects the idea that ‘real’ scholarship is about ‘rational’ social interactions over resources that leaves emotive realities about how resources are accessed, used and fought over firmly to one side. Indeed, (feminist) political ecology will be immeasurably strengthened when often abstract articulations of ‘resource struggles’ and ‘resource conflicts’ are grounded in embodied emotional geographies of places, peoples and resources, enabling enhanced comprehension of how resources and emotions intermingle in everyday resource management practices. An emotional political ecology approach thus elucidates how emotions matter in nature–society relations. How are emotions to be understood in such an endeavor? Work on emotional geographies provides a useful starting-point here. Davidson et al. (2005: 3) define emotional geography as one that ‘attempts to understand emotion – experientially and conceptually – in terms of its socio-spatial mediation and articulation rather than as
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Allan H. Smith;Elena O Lingas;Mahfuzar Rahman
通讯作者：
Allan H. Smith;Elena O Lingas;Mahfuzar Rahman