Accounting for group differences in appraisals of social inequality: differential injustice standards.
Accounting for group differences in appraisals of social inequality: differential injustice standards.
复制标题
考虑社会不平等评估中的群体差异：不同的不公正标准。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
5.4
通讯作者：
N. Branscombe
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Anca M. Miron;Ruth H. Warner;N. Branscombe
我们测试了对不平等的不同评价是否是不同群体使用的不公正标准的函数。不公正的确认性标准被定义为得出不公正已经发生的结论所需的证据数量。与标准观点的动机转变相一致，我们发现，在判断性别（研究 1）和种族（研究 2）工资不平等程度时，优势群体和弱势群体成员设定了不同的不公正标准。此外，由于优势群体和弱势群体成员基于不同的标准对工资不平等形成了不同的评价，他们对恢复群体间正义的愿望也存在差异。我们讨论了促进低确认标准对改变社会现实看法和激励正义恢复行为的影响。
We tested whether differential appraisals of inequality are a function of the injustice standards used by different groups. A confirmatory standard of injustice is defined as the amount of evidence needed to arrive at the conclusion that injustice has occurred. Consistent with a motivational shifting of standards view, we found that advantaged and disadvantaged group members set different standards of injustice when judging the magnitude of gender (Study 1) and racial (Study 2) wage inequality. In addition, because advantaged and disadvantaged group members formed - based on their differential standards - divergent appraisals of wage inequality, they experienced differential desire to restore inter-group justice. We discuss the implications of promoting low confirmatory standards for changing perceptions of social reality and for motivating justice-restorative behaviour.