Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA evidence of polyphyly in the avian superfamily Muscicapoidea

Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA evidence of polyphyly in the avian superfamily Muscicapoidea
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00191-x
复制
发表时间:
2004-02-01
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
Spellman, GM
Spellman, GM
中科院分区:
生物学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Voelker, G;Spellman, GM

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

核c-mos基因和线粒体细胞色素b和ND2基因的核苷酸序列用于评估Sibley和Monroe的单系性[Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World, Yale University Press, New Haven, 19901 Muscicapoidea superfamily。还评估了总科内主要谱系的关系和单系性,以及主要谱系中的属成员资格。分析表明,Bombycillidae 不属于 Muscicapoidea 的一部分,并且有强有力的证据表明 Turdinae 不属于 Muscicapidae 的一部分,而是 Sturnidae + Cinclidae 分支的姐妹。该分支又是鸻科(Muscicapini + Saxicolini)的姐妹。在我们分析的 49 个鸫亚科和蝇科属中,有 10 个属 (20%) 被错误分类为亚科或部落。我们的结果将当前的 Saxicolini 属归于 Turdinae,两个 Saxicolini 属归于 Muscicapini,以及 5 个 Turdinae 和 2 个 Muscicapini 属归于 Saxicolini;这些关系得到 100% 贝叶斯支持。我们的分析表明,c-mos 在解决这些“深层”系统发育关系方面作用不大。 (C) 2003 年由爱思唯尔科学(美国)出版。
Nucleotide sequences of the nuclear c-mos gene and the mitochondrial cytochrome b and ND2 genes were used to assess the monophyly of Sibley and Monroe's [Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World, Yale University Press, New Haven, 19901 Muscicapoidea superfamily. The relationships and monophyly of major lineages within the superfamily, as well as genera membership in major lineages was also assessed. Analyses suggest that Bombycillidae is not a part of Muscicapoidea, and there is strongly supported evidence to suggest that Turdinae is not part of the Muscicapidae, but is instead sister to a Sturnidae + Cinclidae clade. This clade is in turn sister to Muscicapidae (Muscicapini + Saxicolini). Of the 49 Turdinae and Muscicapidae genera that we included in our analyses, 10 (20%) are shown to be misclassified to subfamily or tribe. Our results place one current Saxicolini genus in Turdinae, two Saxicolini genera in Muscicapini, and five Turdinae and two Muscicapini genera in Saxicolini; these relationships are supported with 100% Bayesian support. Our analyses suggest that c-mos was only marginally useful in resolving these "deep" phylogenetic relationships. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Science (USA).