Lawson's Shoehorn, or Should the Philosophy of Science Be Rated ‘X’?

Lawson's Shoehorn, or Should the Philosophy of Science Be Rated ‘X’?
复制标题

劳森的鞋拔子,或者科学哲学应该被评为“X”吗?

DOI:
10.1023/a:1024064409773
复制
发表时间:
2003
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
D. Allchin
D. Allchin
中科院分区:
教育学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. Allchin

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

劳森(Lawson,2002)对伽利略发现木星卫星和其他案例的解释显示了几个历史错误,在这里具体和一般地解决。它们说明了哲学的先入之见如何扭曲历史,从而扭曲关于科学本质的教训。
Lawson's (2002) interpretations of Galileo's discovery of the moons of Jupiter and other cases exhibit several historical errors, addressed here both specifically and generally. They illustrate how philosophical preconceptions can distort history and thus lessons about the nature of science.