How important is the angle of tilt in the WHO cone bioassay?
How important is the angle of tilt in the WHO cone bioassay?
复制标题
DOI:
10.1186/s12936-016-1303-9
复制
发表时间:
2016-04-27
期刊:
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Muller, Pie
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Owusu, Henry F.;Muller, Pie
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) cone bioassay plays an integral role in the evaluation of the efficacy of long-lasting insecticidal nets as well as insecticides used in indoor residual spraying. The test is used on a variety of treated substrates, such as pieces of bed nets, mud, cement and wood. The cone setup assumes a wide variety of angles under different settings in which it is applied. However, the guidelines provided for the performance of the assay do not specify the angle at which the test must be performed.Methods: Laboratory colonies of Anopheles gambiae Kisumu-1 and Anopheles stephensi STI were tested in the WHO cone bioassay at four different angles (0 degrees, 45 degrees, 60 degrees and 90 degrees) following the WHO guidelines against net pieces of Olyset Plus and Netprotect. The tests were repeated after 20 washes of the nets. Individual mosquitoes were also exposed at 0 degrees and 60 degrees and the amount of time each spent in contact with the net was recorded.Results: Mosquitoes spent more time on the net at 60 degrees as compared to 0 degrees (coefficient = 45.8, 95 % CI 34.6-55.6, p < 0.001) and were more likely to die when the test was done at 45 degrees (OR 3.3, 95 % CI 1.7-6.3, p = 0.001), 60 degrees (OR 3.1, 95 % CI 1.7-5.9, p < 0.001) and 90 degrees (OR 6.0, 95 % CI 1.9-18.5, p = 0.002) as compared to 0 degrees.Conclusion: The angle at which the test is performed significantly affects the amount of time mosquitoes spend resting on the nets, and subsequently mortality. Angle must thus be considered as an important component in the performance of the assay and duly incorporated into the guidelines.